🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in an organized professional network test recently after viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they called "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors male users who use online business jargon.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers encountered positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."